DIAGNOSTIC CAPABILITIES OF DETERMINING THE BIOINERTNESS OF STRUCTURAL MATERIALS IN PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
Abstract
Objective: to assess the degree of morphological and histochemical changes in soft tissues under the influence
of various basic acrylic plastics. After creating an experimental model, the animals were divided into 4 groups: I control
group 1 – at 12 rabbits “Ftorax” plastic was used; II control group 2 – in 12 rabbits, used “Vertex”; Group III – comparison
group – 12 rabbits, Meliodent HC was used; IV main group – 12 rabbits, used “Belakril”. The occurrence of pathological
changes was considered as a result of the pathogenic and toxic effects of acrylic plastic materials. Like fibrotic changes,
sclerotic changes in arterial vessels were most pronounced in biopsy specimens taken from animals of control group 1. Plastic
Ftorax, affecting soft tissues negatively, caused some relatively more pronounced reactive processes and histomorphological
changes. Favorable in this regard, the dynamics was detected in the comparison group and in the main group, but in the main
group, the intensity of some histomorphological disorders (changes in the walls of blood vessels, circulatory disorders, etc.)
were relatively higher.
References
2. Олесова В.Н., Максюков В.Н., Калашников В.Н. Осложнения и недостатки съемных зубных протезов и пути оптимизации повторного протезирования зубов // Российский стоматологический журнал. 2009. №6. С.21-24.
3. Огородников М.Ю. Улучшение свойств базисных материалов, использующихся в ортопедической стоматологии: этапы развития // Современная ортопедическая стоматология. 2012. №17. С.70-71.
4. Пиотрович А.В., Евдокимов Е.А., Антонов Е.Н. Рациональный выбор конструкции протеза – залог успешного восстановления зубного ряда// Проблемы стоматологии. 2013. №6. С.24-27.
5. Титов П.Л., Мойсейчик П.Н., Богдан Г.П. Аллергические реакции и непереносимость материалов, используемых в клинике ортопедической стоматологии // Современная стоматология. 2010. №1. С.12-14.
6. Chopde N., Jawale B., Pharande A., et al. Microbial colonization and their relation with potential cofactors in patients with denture stomatitis // Contemp Dent Pract. 2012. Vol. 13. №4. P.456-459.
7. Gendreau L., Loewy Z.G. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis // J Prosthodont. 2011. Vol. 20. P.251-260. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00698.x.
8. Hilgert J.B., Giordani J.M., de Souza R.F., et al. Interventions for the Management of Denture Stomatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. // J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016. Vol. 64. №12. P.2539-2545. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14399.
9. Radović K., Ilić J., Roganović J., et al. K Denture stomatitis and salivary vascular endothelial growth factor in immediate complete denture wearers with type 2 diabetes // J Prosthet Dent. 2014. Vol. 111. №5. P.373-379. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.019.
10. Salerno C., Pascale M., Contaldo M., et al. Candidaassociated denture stomatitis // Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2011. Vol. 16. №2. P.e139-143.
REFERENCES
1. Galinsky Yu.G. Zultan O.Ya., Tsimbalistov A.V. Prevention of dental diseases caused by the presence in the oral cavity orthopedic structures // Stomatologiya. 2008. Spec. issue. 42 p. (in Russian)
2. Olesova V.N., Maksyukov V.N., Kalashnikov V.N. Complications and disadvantages of removable dentures and ways to optimize re-dentures // Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2009. №6. P.21-24. (in Russian)
3. Ogorodnikov M.Yu. Improving the properties of basic materials used in prosthetic dentistry: stages of development // Sovremennaya ortopedicheskaya stomatologiya. 2012. №17. P.70-71. (in Russian)
4. Piotrovich A.V., Evdokimov E.A., Antonov E.N. Rational choice of denture design – the key to successful restoration of the dentition // Problemy stomatologii. 2013. №6. P.24-27. (in Russian)
5. Titov P.L., Moiseychik P.N., Bogdan G.P. Allergic reactions and intolerance to the materials used in the clinic of prosthetic dentistry // Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2010. №1. P.12-14. (in Russian)
6. Chopde N., Jawale B., Pharande A., et al. Microbial colonization and their relation with potential cofactors in patients with denture stomatitis // Contemp Dent Pract. 2012. Vol. 13. №4. P.456-459.
7. Gendreau L., Loewy Z.G. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis // J Prosthodont. 2011. Vol. 20. P.251-260. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00698.x.
8. Hilgert J.B., Giordani J.M., de Souza R.F., et al. Interventions for the Management of Denture Stomatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. // J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016. Vol. 64. №12. P.2539-2545. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14399.
9. Radović K., Ilić J., Roganović J., et al. K Denture stomatitis and salivary vascular endothelial growth factor in immediate complete denture wearers with type 2 diabetes // J Prosthet Dent. 2014. Vol. 111. №5. P.373-379. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.019.
10. Salerno C., Pascale M., Contaldo M., et al. Candidaassociated denture stomatitis // Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2011. Vol. 16. №2. P.e139-143.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
